MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403987263 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104481

Rearing laying hens: Early environmental complexity and genetic strain have life-long effects on keel bone size and fractures

2024· article· en· W4403987263 on OpenAlex
Ana K. Rentsch, Vickneswary Aingkaran, Erin Ross, Tina M. Widowski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock and Poultry Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsKeelLayingBiologyStrain (injury)Animal scienceZoologyAnatomyEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keel bone damage (KBD) is a major welfare concern for laying hens. Environmental complexity during rearing is suggested to promote skeletal development and reduce KB fractures (KBF). We investigated the effect of rearing environment and genetic strain on KB development and health. Three consecutive replicate flocks of brown (B) and white-feathered (W) layer chicks (3000/ flock) were raised in three styles of rearing aviaries of Low,Mid, or High complexity and in conventional cages (Conv). Pullets from flocks 1 and 3 (1080/ flock) were subsequently housed in 24 furnished cages of two sizes (small: 30 vs large: 60 birds) for lay. Samples of pullets and hens were assessed as follows: Dissections at six, 11, and 16 WoA in flocks 1 and 2 for KB size, radiographs at 30, 50, and 70 WoA in flocks 1 and 3, for KBD and dissections at 70 WoA in flock 3 for KBD. Rearing complexity affected KB size of pullets (Conv < High < Mid, Low; P< 0.0001). W pullets had larger keels than B when adjusted for body weight throughout rearing (strain x age P= 0.005) and at 70 WoA (P< 0.001). KBF prevalence at end-of-lay was affected by rearing complexity (High < Low, Conv, P= 0.002). During lay, KBF severity was affected by rearing complexity (High < Low, Mid; P= 0.007), strain (W < B; P< 0.0001) and age (30 < 50 < 70 WoA; P< 0.0001). At 70 WoA, an interaction of rearing by strain affected KBF severity (most severe: B-Conv, least severe: B-Mid and W-High, P= 0.003). KBF severity scores from radiographs and dissections corresponded moderately (r= 0.547, P< 0.0001). The severity of KB deviations was affected by the size of the furnished cages (large > small, P= 0.049). In conclusion, rearing complexity and strain affected KB size and fracture severity and prevalence. These data confirm that complex rearing aviaries that are known to promote exercise reduce KBF severity and prevalence throughout lay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it