Adiponectin as a biomarker in liver cirrhosis—A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adiponectin, a key adipokine, shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker for liver cirrhosis by reflecting inflammation and metabolic changes, but conflicting findings highlight the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify its role. Our study aimed to evaluate adiponectin levels across various stages of liver cirrhosis, compare them with other chronic liver diseases (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and assess its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. METHODS: Our systematic search was conducted on September 2023 using PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus, searching for observational studies evaluating serum and plasma adiponectin levels in liver cirrhosis. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To evaluate the overall effect size, we utilized a random-effects model along with a mean difference (MD) analysis. The principal summary outcome was the MD in adiponectin levels. RESULTS: We included 16 articles involving 2617 subjects in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We found significantly higher adiponectin levels in liver cirrhosis patients (8.181 [95% CI 3.676, 12.686]), especially in Child-Pugh B individuals (13.294 [95% CI 4.955, 21.634]), compared to controls. Child-Pugh A patients did not show significant differences compared to controls. In addition, adiponectin levels were significantly elevated in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients compared to controls (8.669 [95% CI .291, 17.047]), as well as in liver cirrhosis compared to other CLD patients (4.805 [95% CI 1.247, 8.363]), including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (8.532 [95% CI 3.422, 13.641]), but not viral hepatitis. No significant MD was observed between liver cirrhosis and HCC patients. CONCLUSION: Adiponectin levels are significantly elevated in liver cirrhosis, especially in advanced stages, potentially serving as a biomarker for advanced cirrhosis. Adiponectin also differentiates cirrhosis from other CLD, including NAFLD. However, its role in distinguishing cirrhosis from viral hepatitis and HCC is limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".