MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403997574 · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123290

Efficacy of Radicava® IV (intravenous edaravone) in subjects with differing trajectories of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Use of a novel statistical approach for post hoc analysis of a pivotal phase 3 clinical trial

2024· article· en· W4403997574 on OpenAlexaff
Erik P. Pioro, Benjamin Rix Brooks, Ying Liu, Jeffrey Zhang, Stephen Apple

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Neurological Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisEdaravonePost-hoc analysisMedicinePost hocDiseaseMultiple sclerosisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treated with Radicava® (edaravone) IV (intravenous; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America [MTPA], hereafter "MTPA IV edaravone") in Study MCI186-19 had a significantly slower physical functional decline vs placebo-treated subjects as measured by the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and analyzed by the linear mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). This Study 19 post hoc analysis of MTPA IV edaravone-treated and placebo-treated subjects evaluated linear and nonlinear latent class mixed models defining trajectories based on identifying the model with the lowest Bayesian information criterion. The best model differentiated 4 nonlinear trajectories in ALS subjects. ALSFRS-R total score in MTPA IV edaravone-treated and placebo-treated subjects was evaluated for these 4 nonlinear latent class trajectory groups. METHODS: Disease trajectories of MCI186-19 MTPA IV edaravone-treated or placebo-treated ALS subjects who completed the double-blind period were investigated using latent class analysis (LCA) statistical models to identify potential unique nonlinear ALSFRS-R disease trajectories. RESULTS: ALSFRS-R trajectories revealed 4 unique nonlinear trajectory latent classes per treatment group in MTPA IV edaravone-treated and placebo-treated ALS subjects completing the MCI186-19 double-blind period. Latent classes 2-4 had statistically significant slowing of ALSFRS-R total score decline in the predicted nonlinear trajectories of MTPA IV edaravone-treated vs placebo-treated ALS subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests MTPA IV edaravone treatment results in slower ALSFRS-R decline vs placebo in most predicted nonlinear trajectories. LCA is a novel approach that may benefit future trial analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Neurological SciencesSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207