Impact of Children and Youth Sports Programs on the Development of Golf in the Country
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of children's and youth sports programs on the development of golf in the country is a significant area of research since these programs contribute not only to the popularization of sports among the population but also to the development of physical, social, and communication skills among the younger generation. Programs aimed at involving children and adolescents become the fundamental basis for the formation of long - term interest in the sport, ensuring continuity and continuity in the development of golf at the national level. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively study the impact of such programs on the level of involvement of children and adolescents in golf, as well as to assess their contribution to the creation and development of appropriate infrastructure. The methodological approach includes the analysis of statistical data covering the dynamics of the number of participants, as well as changes in infrastructure provision in various regions of the country. Special attention is paid to the analysis of successful foreign methods, such as The First Tee programs in the USA and Future Links in Canada, which have proven their effectiveness in attracting children to golf and forming the necessary sports and social skills. The results of the study demonstrate that targeted programs aimed at working with children and adolescents contribute to a significant increase in golf engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".