MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404007281 · doi:10.1002/hbm.70061

Olfactory Dysfunction and Limbic Hypoactivation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

2024· article· en· W4404007281 on OpenAlexaff
Markus H. Schmidt, Tobias Bauer, M. S. Kehl, Anna Minarik, Lennart Walger, Johannes Schultz, Martin Sylvester Otte, Peter Trautner, Christian Hoppe, Tobias Baumgartner, Louisa Specht‐Riemenschneider, Florian Mormann, Alexander Radbruch, Rainer Surges, Theodor Rüber

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
KeywordsTemporal lobePsychologyOlfactory systemNeuroscienceAudiologyAnterior olfactory nucleusEpilepsyOlfactory memoryPiriform cortexOdorFunctional magnetic resonance imagingOlfactionAmygdalaLimbic systemOlfactory bulbMedicineOlfactory tubercleCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The epileptogenic network in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) contains structures of the primary and secondary olfactory cortex such as the piriform and entorhinal cortex, the amygdala, and the hippocampus. Olfactory auras and olfactory dysfunction are relevant symptoms of TLE. This study aims to characterize olfactory function in TLE using olfactory testing and olfactory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We prospectively enrolled 20 individuals with unilateral TLE (age 45 ± 20 years [mean ± SD], 65% female, 90% right-handed) and 20 healthy individuals (age 33 ± 15 years [mean ± SD], 35% female, 90% right-handed). In the TLE group, the presumed seizure onset zone was left-sided in 75%; in 45% of the individuals with TLE limbic encephalitis was the presumed etiology; and 15% of the individuals with TLE reported olfactory auras. Olfactory function was assessed with a Screening Sniffin' Sticks Test (Burkhart, Wedel, Germany) during a pre-assessment. During a pre-testing, all individuals were asked to rate the intensity, valence, familiarity, and associated memory of five different odors (eugenol, vanillin, phenethyl alcohol, decanoic acid, valeric acid) and a control solution. During the fMRI experiment, all individuals repeatedly smelled eugenol (positively valenced odor), valeric acid (negatively valenced odor), and the control solution and were asked to rate odor intensity on a five-point Likert scale. We acquired functional EPI sequences and structural images (T1, T2, FLAIR). Compared to healthy individuals, individuals with TLE rated the presented odors as more neutral (two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests, FDR-p < 0.05) and less familiar (two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests, FDR-p < 0.05). fMRI data analysis revealed a reduced response contrast in secondary olfactory areas (e.g., hippocampus) connected to the limbic system when comparing eugenol and valeric acid in individuals with TLE when compared with healthy individuals. However, no lateralization effect was obtained when calculating a lateralization index by the number of activated voxels in the olfactory system (two-sided Mann-Whitney U test; U = 176.0; p = 0.525). TLE is characterized by olfactory dysfunction and associated with hypoactivation of secondary olfactory structures connected to the limbic system. These findings contribute to our understanding of the pathophysiology of TLE. This study was preregistered on OSF Registries (www.osf.io).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207