MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404017911 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.29.620818

Genomic epidemiology of emerging terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton indotineae

2024· preprint· en· W4404017911 on OpenAlexaffabout
Johanna Rhodes, Sui Hui, Sarah Dellière, Richard C. Summerbell, James A. Scott, Amtoj Kaur, Richard Barton, Rodrigo Leitao, Samuel Hemmings, Rebeca Goiriz, Jonathan Lambourne, Rhys A. Farrer, Silke Schelenz, Roderick J. Hay, Andrew M. Borman, Anuradha Chowdhary, Alireza Abdolrasouli, Matthew C. Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsTerbinafineEpidemiologyDermatologyMedicineBiologyInternal medicineItraconazoleAntifungal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dermatophyte skin infections affect around a quarter of the world’s population and are a growing public health concern due to increasing incidence of novel species causing severe infections that are resistant to antifungal treatments. Trichophyton species cause the greatest burden of dermatophytosis worldwide, with the T. mentagrophytes species complex being particularly associated with the emergence of new aggressive infections. One emerging species, T. indotineae (originally T. mentagrophytes genotype VIII) is notable for the extensive nature of the often inflammatory infection, its clinical resistance to terbinafine antifungal treatment, and its rapid global spread. To better understand the epidemiology of this disease, we sourced isolates from severe cases of dermatophytosis in the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Canada and India for the period 2018-2023, including the type strain from Japan. We used whole-genome sequencing to confirm 90 isolates were T. indotineae, and antifungal susceptibility testing indicated that over half of these (62%) were resistant to terbinafine (MIC ≥1 mg/L). Pairwise genetic distances showed very high identity with only 147 (1-414) SNPs separating isolates that were nested within a monophyletic phylogeny, supporting a single evolutionary origin of T. indotineae. That no clear geographic clustering of isolates was observed confirms the rapid transcontinental spread of T. indotineae from its likely centre of diversity in Asia. Genome-wide analyses identified multiple non-synonymous SNPs in SQLE (ERG1), the squalene epoxidase target of terbinafine, that were associated with terbinafine in vitro resistance ≥1 mg/L. However, five isolates exhibited high MIC values without SQLE mutations, suggesting the presence of alternative resistance mechanisms. Our findings highlight the importance of better genomic surveillance to understand and manage this severe and rapidly emerging terbinafine-resistant dermatophyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNail Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207