MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404020120 · doi:10.1556/650.2024.33140

Szükséges-e a subarachnoidealis vérzésen átesett betegek pszichológiai követése?

2024· article· hu· W4404020120 on OpenAlex
Vera Beálló, Tamás Németh, Mona Stankovic, Pál Barzó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrvosi Hetilap · 2024
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyPhysicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: After aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), even apparently fully recovered patients often report serious psychological problems (anxiety, depression, mood swings, loss of concentration, memory impairment). Objective: Our aim is to assess, in a pilot study, the effectiveness of available and commonly used psychological tests in assessing the condition of patients after SAH and to start the development of a post-SAH psychological care system. Methods: From May 2023 to January 2024, a total of 52 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage who had a good outcome, i.e., were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic but still self-sufficient (modified Rankin scale <2), were included in our study. In addition to general patient data (age, sex, education), we recorded the treatment modality and excluded patients with significant deterioration as a complication of aneurysm treatment. According to the main aim of our study, we used the following psychological tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa), Spielberger State/Trait Anxiety Questionnaire (STAI-S/T), Beck Depression Questionnaire (short version; BDI-R). Results: According to the above criteria, a total of 38 women and 14 men with a mean age of 53 years (SD = 7.14) were included in our study. Psychological examination revealed cognitive impairment in 1/3 of the patients, 74% with some degree of depression, 10% with high levels of depression, and 42% with above average anxiety. There is a correlation between the level of anxiety, the severity of depression and the likelihood of developing cognitive impairment. Discussion and conclusion: Our results so far suggest that even in somatically almost asymptomatic patients, moderate to severe psychological problems occur regularly after SAH, which requires psychological care. Our study has shown that the psychological tests available in Hungarian are not suitable for accurate mapping the condition of patients with SAH and then tracking changes due to the learning effect. Furthermore, it became clear that the modified Rankin scale used to classify the outcome of the disease is not sufficient information on the psychological state of the patients, as it does not differentiate well in terms of symptoms, and therefore a new, complementary SAH-specific test needs to be applied, adopted and localised, which our institution has started to do. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(44): 1753–1759.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it