MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404026867 · doi:10.14740/jem1020

A Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Context of COVID-19

2024· article· en· W4404026867 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vishnu Shivam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational diabetesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Context (archaeology)Diabetes mellitusInternal medicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Meta-analysisPregnancyGestationEndocrinologyVirologyDiseaseOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The objectives of this study are: 1) to compare the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts, 2) to evaluate the risk of GDM among pregnant women who tested positive and negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and 3) to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 among pregnant women diagnosed with and without GDM. Methods: A literature search was carried out in PubMed and Cochrane library databases with relevant keywords from its inception till March 2024. Observational studies that 1) evaluated the prevalence of GDM during pandemic and pre-pandemic period, and 2) investigated the GDM and COVID-19 status among pregnant women were included. Results: The analysis revealed that the prevalence of GDM was significantly increased by 17% (odds ratio (OR), 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12 to 1.23; P < 0.00001) during the pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic period and the odds of pregnant women with GDM tested positive for COVID-19 were 1.28-fold greater (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.44; P < 0.0001) than the odds of pregnant women with GDM tested negative for COVID-19. However, the analysis also revealed that pregnant women with COVID-19 were less likely (OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.02; P < 0.00001) to be diagnosed with GDM when compared to pregnant women with COVID-19 and without GDM. Conclusion: The present study suggests that GDM acts as a risk factor for COVID-19 infection among pregnant women. This might be due to the hypothesis that altered sense of taste is associated among pregnant women with GDM and COVID-19 due to the taste receptor polymorphisms which regulates the innate immunity downstream signaling. However, molecular studies were needed to validate this hypothesis and evaluate the therapeutic role of taste receptors in the management of COVID-19 and GDM. J Endocrinol Metab. 2024;14(5):226-239 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jem1020

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.044
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207