Understanding and Predicting Ligand Efficacy in the μ-Opioid Receptor through Quantitative Dynamical Analysis of Complex Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is a G-protein coupled receptor involved in nociception and the primary target of opioid drugs. Understanding the relationships among the ligand structure, receptor dynamics, and efficacy in activating MOR is crucial for drug discovery and development. Here, we use coarse-grained normal-mode analysis to predict ligand-induced changes in receptor dynamics with the Quantitative Dynamics Activity Relationship (QDAR) DynaSig-ML methodology, training a LASSO regression model on the entropic signatures (ESs) computed from ligand-receptor complexes. We train and validate the methodology using a data set of 179 MOR ligands with experimentally measured efficacies split into strictly chemically different cross-validation sets. By analyzing the coefficients of the ES LASSO model, we identified key residues involved in MOR activation, several of which have mutational data supporting their role in MOR activation. Additionally, we explored a contact-only LASSO model based on ligand-protein interactions. While the model showed predictive power, it failed at predicting efficacy for ligands with low structural similarity to the training set, emphasizing the importance of receptor dynamics for predicting ligand-induced receptor activation. Moreover, the low computational cost of our approach, at 3 CPU s per ligand-receptor complex, opens the door to its application in large-scale virtual screening contexts. Our work contributes to a better understanding of dynamics-function relationships in the μ-opioid receptor and provides a framework for predicting ligand efficacy based on ligand-induced changes in receptor dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".