MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404034703 · doi:10.1145/3666025.3699371

M3Cam: Extreme Super-resolution via Multi-Modal Optical Flow for Mobile Cameras

2024· article· en· W4404034703 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Lu, Dian Ding, Hao Pan, Yongjian Fu, Liyun Zhang, Feitong Tan, Ran Wang, Yi‐Chao Chen, Guangtao Xue, Ju Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOptical flowModalComputer visionImage (mathematics)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for ultra-high-resolution imaging in mobile phone photography is continuously increasing. However, the image resolution of mobile devices is typically constrained by the size of the CMOS sensor. Although deep learning-based super-resolution (SR) techniques have the potential to overcome this limitation, existing SR neural network models require large computational resources, making them unsuitable for real-time SR imaging on current mobile devices. Additionally, cloud-based SR systems pose privacy leakage risks. In this paper, we propose M3Cam, an innovative and lightweight SR imaging system for mobile phones. M3Cam can ensure high-quality 16× SR image (4× in both height and width) visualization with almost negligible latency. In detail, we utilize an optical image stabilization (OIS) module for lens control and introduce a new modality of data, namely gyroscope readings, to achieve high-precision and compact optical flow estimation modules. Building upon this concept, we design a multi-frame-based SR model utilizing the Swin Transformer. Our proposed system can generate a 16× SR image from four captured low-resolution images in real-time, with low computational load, low inference latency, and minimal reliance on runtime RAM. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed multi-modal optical flow model significantly enhances pixel alignment accuracy between multiple frames and delivers outstanding 16× SR imaging results under various shooting scenarios. Code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/liangjindeamo-yuer/M3CAM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207