MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Microwave Photonic Neural Network Using Recurrent Multi-Frequency Single-Sideband Modulation in an Optical Fiber Loop

2024· article· en· W4404036511 on OpenAlexaff
Yiran Guan, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompatible sideband transmissionPhotonicsModulation (music)SidebandFrequency modulationLoop (graph theory)Optical fiberMicrowaveAmplitude modulationOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsRadio frequencyEngineeringAcousticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking advantage of the high speed and wide bandwidth of photonics, microwave photonics (MWP) is well-suited for high-speed signal processing. In this paper, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a novel microwave photonic neural network based on recurrent carrier-suppressed single sideband (CS-SSB) modulation implemented using an amplified optical fiber loop incorporating a dual-parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator (DP-MZM). We show that the matrix-vector multiplication (MVM) between the neurons and weights can be implemented by multi-tone CS-SSB modulation on multiple optical carriers. By using a programmable optical filter to introduce attenuations and control the powers of the sidebands, it is also possible to achieve the desired neuron biases. Multiple layers in a deep neural network are realized by recurrent CS-SSB modulation and programmable filtering in the optical fiber loop. The approach is evaluated experimentally. A 2-2-4 feedforward neural network at a computational speed of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$30\times 10^{6}\text{MAC}/\mathrm{s}$</tex> (multiply-accumulate operations per second) is implemented to successfully tackle the task of 2-bit binary number recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207