MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP323 Topic: AS07–Family Care: Patient and Family Centered Care, Family Presence, Patient and Family Engagement in Research and Care/Patient Diaries/Other: UN-SEEN PATIENTS: CARING FOR SIBLINGS DURING PEDIATRIC CRITICAL HOSPITALIZATION

2024· article· en· W4404041016 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Dryden‐Palmer, Alexis Shinewald, Karina T. O'Leary

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily centered careFamily medicineNursingHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Childhood critical illness impacts the entire family. Disruption to routines, relationships, shifts in caregivers and uncertainty can significantly impact siblings and other children connected to family. Addressing sibling needs can reduce patient and family anxiety, enhance family adaptation, and improve child and family outcomes. We will describe the potential impacts of a critical illness hospitalization on siblings and offer experience- informed approaches for providing developmentally aligned support to impacted children. Methods: A sampling of the foundational and current evidence related to sibling experience was accessed and complimented by the author’s combined 98 years of practice experience caring for critically ill children and their families. Recommendations are moderated by the authors and supported by lived experience. Results: The experience of the critical hospitalization of a sibling or close family member is unique to the sibling relationship, their age and stage of development and the context of the hospitalization. Disruptions in the family, changes in parental behaviors, exposure to unfamiliar situations, uncertainty and fear can be overwhelming to the well children in the family. Practical interventions that are principle-based, goal-directed and individualized are effective in surfacing and addressing the needs of siblings. Conclusions: Sibling wellbeing is essential to family adaptation in critical childhood illness. It is fundamental that critical care providers seek out and actively engage with families to plan how to best support siblings and younger family members. Practical interventions that enable consistent, transparent, and strength- based sibling care facilitate best outcomes for the entire family. Keywords: family centered care, Siblings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3320.115

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207