MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP061 Topic: AS07–Family Care: Patient and Family Centered Care, Family Presence, Patient and Family Engagement in Research and Care/Patient Diaries/Other: ENTERING PLACES OF SUFFERING - NURSES’ PERSPECTIVES ON ENACTING COMPASSION IN THE PICU

2024· article· en· W4404041020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amy L. Neufeldt, Dianne M. Tapp, Shane Sinclair, Gillian Lemermeyer

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompassionMedicineFamily centered careNursingEmpathyFamily medicinePsychiatryHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Compassion means to “suffer with another person” and to take action to alleviate their suffering. Compassion toward patients and families has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes, enhance quality care ratings, and decrease staff burnout. Despite growing discourses on compassion in healthcare and its reputed importance, there has been no previous research investigating compassion among nurses in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) context. The purpose of this research was to explore how nurses enact compassion in the PICU. Methods: This study used the interpretive description methodology. Seven registered nurses from Canadian PICUs participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Two main themes were understood in an overarching metaphor that described ways nurses enact compassion toward patients and families in PICUs: “Opening the Door” and “Being Inside.” Enacting compassion involved a willingness to courageously enter into both the physical patient room and into patient and family experiences of suffering—to suffer with them. Nurses have a uniquely challenging role in relation to compassion by being a healthcare team member with the most consecutive hours of engagement with patients and families. Additionally, this study offers a novel distinction between compassionate actions that invite patients and families to open up, and compassionate actions that depend on openness or trust having already been established. Conclusions: This study contributes PICU nurse perspectives on how they practically enacted compassion in their context, which involved ways of both Opening the Door and Being Inside with patients and families. Keywords: compassion, Family centred care, nursing, suffering, engagement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207