MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP380 Topic: AS13–Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant/Immunology: CANADIAN NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE OF PEDIATRIC PULMONARY THROMBOEMBOLISM: A COMPARISON OF CHILDREN WHO WERE AND WERE NOT ADMITTED TO THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

2024· article· en· W4404041263 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lily Ramsay, Paul Moorehead, Anthony K.C. Chan, Sarah McMullen, Amy C. Plint, Kristina Krmpotic

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation CentreAgricultural Research Institute of OntarioNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematologyPediatric oncologyIntensive care medicineIntensive care unitStem cellOncologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Pediatric pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening event. This study compares risk factors, symptoms, diagnostic modalities, interventions, and short-term outcomes for children with PE who were and were not managed in PICU. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2022, monthly surveillance was conducted with over 2,800 pediatricians and sub-specialists in Canada. Voluntary reporting of cases was followed up with a detailed questionnaire. Results: Detailed information was available for 31 (53%) of 58 reported cases; 11 (35%) were managed in PICU. PICU patients were of similar age (median 15.8 years; interquartile range 8.8-16.6 years) to non-PICU patients (median 15.6 years; interquartile range 13.3-16.9 years), p=0.52. No significant differences were observed between proportions of PICU and non-PICU patients who were female (82% vs 80%, p=0.9), symptomatic (82% vs 90%, p=0.52), had at least one risk factor (91% vs 90%, p=0.93), presented to non-tertiary hospitals (55% vs 60%, p=0.77), and diagnosed using computed tomography pulmonary angiography (64% vs 90%, p=0.07). PICU patients were more often initially treated with unfractionated heparin (n=6; 55%) compared to non-PICU patients, who received low molecular weight heparin (n=17; 85%), p<0.01. PICU patients experienced major complications of treatment (n=5; 45%), whereas fewer than 5 non-PICU patients had only minor complications, p=0.06. All reported mortalities (<5) occurred in PICU patients. Conclusions: Initial therapy differed between children with PE who were and were not admitted to PICU. Whether this can be accounted for by severity of illness upon presentation or treatment complications is unclear. Keywords: hematology, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207