MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OP053 Topic: AS07–Family Care: Patient and Family Centered Care, Family Presence, Patient and Family Engagement in Research and Care/Patient Diaries/Other: UNPLANNED INPATIENT TRANSFERS TO THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF PARENTAL EXPERIENCES

2024· article· en· W4404041604 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Cameron, J. Bretzler, Molly Ryan, Kristina Krmpotic

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily centered carePediatric intensive care unitFamily medicineNursingCritical care nursingMedical emergencyHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission is associated with psychological morbidity for children and families. Prior studies focusing on parental experiences of PICU admissions have identified transitions of care as a theme. This study explores aspects unique to transitions to and from PICU in the context of an in-hospital deterioration event. Methods: Single-center, qualitative descriptive study in which parents of children who survived to PICU discharge after inpatient deterioration and unplanned transfer to PICU were interviewed. Transcripts were independently inductively coded by two reviewers. Once coding consensus was reached, a thematic analysis was conducted to generate key themes. Results: Parents of 13 children (age 1 month to 16 years) who experienced in-hospital clinical deterioration and unplanned transfer to the PICU participated. Key themes were: 1) time to mentally prepare (prior PICU experiences, noticing their child changing, rapid sentinel event, night-time disorientation); 2) dichotomy of relief and apprehension (uncertainty and fear of admission, relief about recovery, monitoring in different environments); 3) family-centered care (valued as part of the healthcare team, communication and understanding rationale, importance of parental support person); and, 4) continuity of care (witnessing team handovers, familiar faces in follow-up). Conclusions: Parents experience mixed emotions when their child deteriorates and is transferred from an inpatient unit to PICU and upon PICU discharge to the hospital ward. As part of a family-centered approach to care, active efforts to include parents in the assessment of their child’s clinical condition and during times of transition may aid in mental preparation for transitions to and from PICU. Keywords: family centered care, family experience, patient transfer, qualitative, patient deterioration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207