MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PP332 Topic: AS09–Global Health/Resource Limited Setting/Health Inequalities/Impact of Global Warming/Other: GLOBAL RESOURCE NEEDS IN PAEDIARTRIC EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE: AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY

2024· article· en· W4404041752 on OpenAlexaff
T Haj-Hassan, Fiona Muttalib, Ad Bafa Ibrahim Ouattara, Anita V. Arias, Haifa Mtaweh

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlobal healthResource (disambiguation)InequalityGlobal warmingHealth carePublic healthClimate changeEconomic growthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims & Objectives: Access to life-saving paediatric acute care resources is limited globally, particularly in regions with the highest burden of paediatric critical illness. We aim to determine the essential paediatric emergency and critical care resources that critically ill children should have access to in resource limited settings (RLS) as determined by providers in those settings. Methods: An international, two stage modified Delphi study is underway. Core researchers established a list of hospital readiness requirements based on existing clinical guidelines and tools, including equipment, drugs, consumables, laboratory tests, human resources, training, and infrastructure. Medical providers from RLS answered the availability of these items in their settings and their perception of the need for them on a Likert scale. Respondents were recruited via a broad, international sampling strategy. The survey is provided in English, Arabic, French, and Spanish. Results: The 198 respondents were distributed primarily throughout the global south, with 60% of respondents working low and low-middle income countries. Data analysis of round one of the Delphi found limited access to the preliminary list of hospital readiness requirements, and consensus (>75% agreement) that the listed items were essential for the care of critically ill children in their settings. Round two of the Delphi will include newly suggested items by participants. Conclusions: This global consensus survey will establish the paediatric acute care standards that critically ill children should have access to in settings where resources limit care. The resulting cohesive list could be used to inform effective emergency and critical care capacity-building in RLS. Keywords: International survey, Resource Limited Settings (RLS), Paediatric Emergency & Critical Care

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207