MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404049809 · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.047

The Novel Lipid Emulsion Vegaven Is Well Tolerated and Elicits Distinct Biological Actions Compared With a Mixed-Oil Lipid Emulsion Containing Fish Oil: A Parenteral Nutrition Trial in Piglets

2024· article· en· W4404049809 on OpenAlexafffund
Eliana Lucchinetti, Phing‐How Lou, Akash Chakravarty, Camila Schultz Marcolla, Mirielle Pauline, Pamela R. Wizzard, Catherine J. Field, Eytan Wine, Martin Hersberger, Paul W. Wales, Justine Turner, Stefanie D. Krämer, Michael Zaugg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsEmulsionFish oilLipid emulsionFat emulsionParenteral nutritionFood scienceChemistryFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyBiochemistryInternal medicineMedicineFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Vegaven is a novel lipid emulsion for parenteral nutrition (PN) based on 18-carbon n-3 (ω-3) fatty acids, which elicits liver protection via interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the murine model of PN. OBJECTIVES: In a preclinical model of PN in neonatal piglets, Vegaven was tested for efficacy and safety and compared with a mixed-oil lipid emulsion containing fish oil (SMOFlipid). METHODS: Male piglets 4-5 d old were randomly allocated to isocaloric isonitrogenous PN for 14 d, which varied only by the type of lipid emulsion (Vegaven, n = 8; SMOFlipid, n = 8). Hepatic IL-10 tissue concentration served as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were organ weights, bile flow, blood analyses, plasma insulin and glucagon concentrations, insulin signaling, proinflammatory cytokines, tissue lipopolysaccharide concentrations, and fatty acid composition of phospholipid fractions in plasma, liver, and brain. RESULTS: Total weight gain on trial, organ weights, and bile flow were similar between the Vegaven and the SMOFlipid group. Vegaven elicited higher hepatic IL10 (Δ = 148 pg/mg protein; P < 0.001) and insulin receptor substrate-2 amounts (Δ = 0.08 OD; P = 0.012). Plasma insulin concentrations (Δ = 1.46 mU/L; P = 0.003) and fructosamine (glycated albumin, Δ = 12.4 μmol/g protein; P = 0.003) were increased in SMOFlipid as compared with those of Vegaven group, indicating insulin resistance. Higher hepatic injury markers were observed more frequently in the SMOFlipid group than those in the Vegaven group. Lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis factor-α, and IL-6 concentrations increased in pancreatic and brain tissues of SMOFlipid-treated compared with those in the Vegaven-treated piglets. Insulin signaling reduced in the brains of SMOFlipid-treated piglets. Vegaven and SMOFlipid elicited distinct fatty acid profiles in the phospholipid fractions of the rapidly growing brains but showed similar accretion of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid after 2 wk of PN. CONCLUSIONS: Vegaven is well tolerated in this piglet model of PN, demonstrating distinct biological actions compared with SMOFlipid, namely lower liver, pancreas, and brain inflammation, enhanced insulin signaling, and improved whole body glucose control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NutritionSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207