MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404050519 · doi:10.1111/ejh.14317

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Aplastic Anemia During Pregnancy and Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2024· review· en· W4404050519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aashima Arora, Arihant Jain, Deepesh Lad, D. Ganguly, Pankaj Khatri, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Amol Patil, Pankaj Malhotra, Vanita Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal Of Haematology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsMeta-analysisPreeclampsiaAplastic anemiaAbortionPublication biasCohort studyRetrospective cohort studyProspective cohort studyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little scientific evidence exists on maternal and fetal outcomes in aplastic anemia (AA) during pregnancy. AIM: The review was conducted to assess the maternal and fetal outcomes due to AA during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and registries until May 5, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies (prospective, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, one arm, survey, follow-up studies) evaluating AA during pregnancy were searched as per PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42024506668). Case reports, case series, expert opinion letters, and studies assessing less than or equal to 10 pregnant women were not considered. The primary outcome was the prevalence of preeclampsia in AA pregnancies. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous abortion, preterm premature rupture of membranes, premature rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, type of delivery, intrauterine fetal death, maternal and neonatal mortality, and pre and post-pregnancy remission status comparison. METHODS: The quality of research was checked using the New Castle-Ottawa risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis model with a random effect distribution, coupled with meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment, was used in the statistical software R. Standard Equator network study reporting guidelines were followed. RESULTS: = 26%). The secondary outcome evaluation showed a pooled prevalence of 5% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for spontaneous abortion, 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) for preterm premature rupture of membranes, 10% (95% CI, 3%-28%) for premature rupture of membranes, 6% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for fetal growth restriction, 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) for intrauterine fetal death, 12% (95% CI, 5%-26%) for post-partum hemorrhage, 74% (95% CI, 45%-91%) for intrapartum transfusion requirement, and 55% (95% CI, 27%-80%) for the cesarean delivery opting. The maternal mortality in pregnancies with AA was 4% (95% CI, 0.01-0.14), whereas neonatal mortality was 7% (95% CI, 0.03-0.18). The odds of AA complete remission were better in pre-pregnancy than post-pregnancy (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.08-1.66), although the results remain insignificant. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not change the pooled estimates for the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: A risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in every eighth pregnant woman with an AA diagnosis. AA remission status might worsen after undergoing pregnancy, considering the significant obstetric morbidity and mortality burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal Of HaematologySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207