MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404056908 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3491951

Outsourcing Attribute-Based Encryption to Enhance IoT Security and Performance

2024· article· en· W4404056908 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Bany Taha, Fawaz A. Khasawneh, Ahmad Nahar Quttoum, Muteb Alshammari, Zakaria Alomari

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionOutsourcingComputer scienceInternet of ThingsComputer securityBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) systems, particularly those integrated with cloud technology, continues to expand, ensuring data security and privacy while maintaining optimal performance becomes increasingly challenging. Complex encryption algorithms, when run on IoT devices with limited resources, can significantly hinder processing speed and resource efficiency. This paper introduces an innovative Attribute-Based Encryption (ABE) framework that offloads computationally intensive cryptographic operations to a proxy server. This approach alleviates the computational strain on resource-constrained IoT devices, allowing them to efficiently handle encryption and decryption tasks despite their limited processing power, memory, and battery life. Additionally, we present a robust security model that ensures the privacy and integrity of data in IoT environments, in line with the requirements of ABE. We conduct an extensive performance analysis, evaluating key metrics such as execution time, ciphertext size, and memory usage, demonstrating that our proposed scheme surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods in efficiency. The primary contributions of this work include the development of a lightweight ABE offloading framework, the creation of a strong security model, and a thorough performance assessment that highlights the scheme’s efficiency and practicality for real-world IoT applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207