MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessing the Circuit Requirements for a Real-Time Spectrum Analyzer on 65-nm CMOS Technology

2024· article· en· W4404057397 on OpenAlexaff
Mojgan Mirzaei Hotkani, Jean‐François Bousquet, Bruce Martin, Ehsan Malekshahi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrum analyzerCMOSComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a detailed investigation into the development and assessment of a real-time spectrum analyzer implemented on a 65-nm CMOS Technology Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). The analyzer features a developed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithm designed for optimal energy efficiency and minimal area usage, with a structured architecture for low, middle, and high-frequency ranges. Operating at a clock frequency of 14 MHz, the signal is sampled at 65536 Hz to produce a wideband power spectral density represented on a logarithmic scale. Integration with an ADS8881 ADC ensures high-fidelity input, and the output is transmitted to a host computer via a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI). The study includes detailed evaluations through pre-synthesis simulation, post-synthesis simulation, and practical implementation on a Nexys4 FPGA board. The proposed FFT algorithm undergoes rigorous simulation at various synthesis stages, providing a nuanced performance analysis. Practical functionality is assessed on the FPGA, offering insights into the behavior of the circuit. The paper also discusses comprehensively the system’s power consumption and calculates the maximum area utilization for the 65-nm CMOS technology, providing essential metrics for optimizing power efficiency and physical footprint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207