Study on crashworthiness of square frustum lattice structure under in-plane compression load
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The direction of load on the component in engineering applications is often uncertain, so the excellent crashworthiness and smooth load transfer of energy-absorbing structures in various directions is of great application value. Square frustum lattice structure (SFLS) was proposed based on the control of cell deformation mode and the improvement of in-plane strength without increasing the overall mass. Compared with multi-cell tubes commonly used in engineering and origami-patterned structure with excellent performance in research, it is found that the SFLS shows high and stable energy absorption capacity with the same structural parameters. The SEA and CFE of SFLS are 1.7 times and 3.5 times of origami structure and multi-cell tube, respectively, and the fluctuation indicator of the force displacement curve of origami structure and multi-cell tube are 1.7 times and 2.7 times of that of SFLS. In-plane quasi-static compression experiment was carried out and the finite element model was verified. The results of parametric analysis and sensitivity show that, compared with the change of cell number and cell height, the crashworthiness of SFLS under in-plane compression was most sensitive to the ratio of side length, in the range of parameters studied, the maximum SEA value of SFLS can reach 79.35 J/g for k value equal to 0.3, while the best indicator of smoothness of force-displacement curve of SFLS is found at k equal to 0.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it