Duality in disease: How two amino acid substitutions at actin residue 312 result in opposing forms of cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two common types of cardiovascular disease are hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) which occur from changes to sarcomere contractile mechanisms and activity. Actin amino acid substitutions R312C and R312H have been found in HCM and DCM patients, respectively. Previously, we observed that R312C/H variants display both hyperactivity and hypoactivity in vitro, contradicting traditional characterizations of HCM- and DCM-causing variants. Here, we further characterized R312C/H actin variants in vitro and conducted in silico modeling to better understand the mechanisms differentiating HCM and DCM. Our results suggest that R312C/H substitutions cause structural changes that differentially impact actomyosin activity. A gradient of altered interactions with regulatory proteins troponin, tropomyosin, and the C0C2 domains of myosin-binding protein C was also observed, influencing the accessibility of active and inhibitory conformations of these proteins. The results presented here support our previous suggestion of a gradient of factors that differentiate between HCM and DCM. Further characterization of HCM- and DCM-causing actin variants using in vitro and in silico methods is required for better understanding cardiomyopathy and improving clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".