Control of the Motion of an Inverted Spherical Pendulum on a Moving Base. Hybrid Impact Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new hybrid method for the construction of control actions of a linear control system with constant coefficients is considered in this paper. It is assumed in this paper that a part of the discussed system meets some conditions. Some states of the main system are considered to be control actions for a subsystem for which and LQR stabilizer is acquired. Then, those control actions of the subsystem are used to construct the control actions for the main system. In the problem of controlling the motion of a complex linear system of an inverted spherical pendulum on a moving base, a new approach to the construction of control actions (hybrid action method) was used. It is assumed that a component of the complex system under discussion satisfies certain conditions. The inertial forces at the center of mass of the base of the composite system are considered to be the controlling influences on the inversion of the pendulum, for which the LQR stabilizer was purchased. The determined internal control actions on the inverted pendulum are then used to construct external control actions on the base of the composite system. In the end, a numerical analysis was carried out.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it