Lifted TASEP: A Solvable Paradigm for Speeding up Many-Particle Markov Chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Virtually all Markov-chain Monte Carlo algorithms used for sampling a given distribution are reversible, and they satisfy the detailed-balance condition. For local chains, this leads to a slow, diffusive exploration of sample space. Significant speedups can be achieved through nonreversible algorithms with the given distribution as a targeted steady state. However, nonreversible algorithms for sampling are difficult to set up and to analyze, and exact speedup results for interacting many-particle systems are very rare. Here, we introduce the “lifted” totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) as an exactly solvable paradigm for nonreversible many-particle Markov chains. It samples the same hard-sphere distribution as the Metropolis algorithm for symmetrically diffusing hard-core particles on a one-dimensional lattice. We solve the lifted TASEP by an unusual kind of coordinate Bethe ansatz and show that it exhibits polynomial (in particle number) speedups in the relaxation time for the asymptotic approach of the steady state, as well as the nonasymptotic mixing time, compared to both Metropolis and Kardar-Parisi-Zhang-based dynamics. The lifted TASEP is the reduction onto the one-dimensional lattice of the successful hard-sphere event-chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and we discuss that it can likewise be generalized to soft interaction potentials. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".