MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404092745 · doi:10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1661

Association between intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to depression and blood-brain barrier penetration in cerebellar vascular disease

2024· article· en· W4404092745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rui Wang, Peiqi Ma, You-Meng Wang, Qiqiang Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioInternal medicineConfidence intervalMagnetic resonance imagingDepression (economics)PopulationGastroenterologyBlood–brain barrierPost-stroke depressionHyperintensityPathologyRadiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a prevalent cerebrovascular disease in clinical practice that is often associated with macrovascular disease. A clear understanding of the underlying causes of CSVD remains elusive. AIM To explore the association between intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration in CSVD. METHODS This study included patients admitted to Fuyang People’s Hospital and Fuyang Community (Anhui, China) between December 2021 and March 2022. The study population comprised 142 patients, including 80 in the CSVD group and 62 in the control group. Depression was present in 53 out of 80 patients with CSVD. Multisequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were applied in patients to determine the brain volume, cortical thickness, and cortical area of each brain region. Moreover, neuropsychological tests including the Hamilton depression scale, mini-mental state examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment basic scores were performed. RESULTS The multivariable analysis showed that age [P = 0.011; odds ratio (OR) = 0.930, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.880-0.983] and ICAM-1 levels (P = 0.023; OR = 1.007, 95%CI: 1.001-1.013) were associated with CSVD. Two regions of interest (ROIs; ROI3 and ROI4) in the white matter showed significant (both P < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.419-0.837 and 0.366-0.878) differences between the two groups, whereas only ROI1 in the gray matter showed significant difference (P = 0.046; 95%CI: 0.007-0.680) between the two groups. ICAM-1 was significantly correlated (all P < 0.05) with cortical thickness in multiple brain regions in the CSVD group. CONCLUSION This study revealed that ICAM-1 levels were independently associated with CSVD. ICAM-1 may be associated with cortical thickness in the brain, predominantly in the white matter, and a significant increase in BBB permeability, proposing the involvement of ICAM-1 in BBB destruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of PsychiatrySame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207