Coronary Sinus Narrowing for Treating Refractory Angina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory angina are often ineligible for revascularization and have poor quality of life despite optimal medical therapy. The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer (Shockwave Medical Inc) was safe and effective in the treatment of refractory angina in the COSIRA (Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina) randomized sham-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform the primary endpoint analysis of the complete REDUCER-I (An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer System) study cohort. METHODS: REDUCER-I is a nonrandomized, "real-world" study of patients with refractory angina treated with the CS Reducer conducted at 25 centers from 9 European countries. The primary effectiveness endpoint was an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class at 6 months. The primary safety endpoints were major adverse cardiac events and device- or procedure-related serious adverse events through 30 days. Study follow-up is planned through 5 years with some interim 3-year analyses included here. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2023, 400 patients were enrolled, including 78.0% (312/400) male patients, 54.3% (216/398) with previous myocardial infarction, 73.6% (293/398) with previous revascularization, and 72.0% (280/389) CCS class III/IV. Major adverse cardiac event and serious adverse event rates were 1.6% (95% CI: 0.7-3.6) and 1.1% (4/371), respectively, with no deaths within 30 days. At 6 months, 69.8% (240/344) of patients improved by ≥1 CCS class. Six-minute walk distances improved by 34.1 ± 85.8 m at 6 months (P < 0.0001). Interim 3-year results showed CCS class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality of life improvements were sustained (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The complete primary endpoint analysis of the REDUCER-I study shows patients with refractory angina were safely and effectively treated with the CS Reducer. Improvements in angina and quality of life appear sustained through 3 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".