MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantifying the effect of pirfenidone treatment on bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mice model in vivo using a novel synchrotron-based imaging method

2024· article· en· W4404102215 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojie Luan, M. Adam Webb, Flinn N. Herriot, Veronica Marcoux, Julian S. Tam, Juan P. Ianowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPirfenidoneBleomycinIn vivoPulmonary fibrosisMedicineSynchrotronIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisFibrosisBiomedical engineeringCancer researchPathologyLungInternal medicineBiologyChemotherapyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<bold>Background:</bold> We have developed a synchrotron-based x-ray diffraction enhance imaging (DEI)-based multiple-image radiography (MIR) imaging method to follow the progression of alveolar damage over time in bleomycin (BLM)-induced fibrosis in C57BL/6 mice <italic>in vivo</italic>. Here we investigated the anti-fibrotic effect of pirfenidone (PFD) under two conditions: treatment starting before BLM challenge (i.e. continuous), or starting from day 9 after BLM challenge, when fibrosis is established (i.e. therapeutic). <bold>Methods:</bold> Pulmonary fibrosis was induced by intratracheal administration of BLM (2.0 unit/kg). PFD treatment (30 mg/kg) was administered daily via oral gavage (n=6 for continuous, and n=7 for therapeutic); the effectiveness of the treatment was compared to a BLM, no treatment (n=16) and a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group (n=6). <bold>Results:</bold> The continuous PFD treatment significantly prevented fibrosis formation. The therapeutic PFD treatment reduced the lung damage cause by BLM at week 2 and 3 after BLM challenge and accelerated the recovery of the mice (Fig 1). <bold>Summary:</bold> Synchrotron-based DEI-MIR provides a non-invasive quantitative assessment tool for testing the effect of current treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in small rodent models; and this imaging technique could be used for developing new treatments for the IPF patients. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA858/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207