Plasma essential amino acid levels in first episode psychosis at baseline and after antipsychotic treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed plasma levels of essential amino acids (EAA) in drug-naïve first episode psychosis (FEP) patients at diagnosis and after 10 weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Forty FEP patients were enrolled at baseline, with blood samples collected before and after a 10-week antipsychotic treatment period. Plasma EAA levels were measured using an LC/MS/MS method. Psychotic symptoms were evaluated using standardized inventories before and after treatment. A decrease in BPRS score of more than 40% was used to indicate treatment response. Thirty-five healthy volunteers served as the control group. Baseline plasma levels of Thr, Met, Leu, Lys, His, and Tyr were higher in FEP patients than in healthy controls. After 10 weeks of treatment, Leu, His, and Tyr increased further, primarily in treatment-responsive patients. Conversely, Val level was lower than controls in patients at baseline and remained unchanged after treatment. Increased EAA levels were correlated with lower (less severe) scores in positive symptom scales. Treatment non-responders had persistently low Tyr/large neutral amino acid (LNAA) ratio. Tyr/LNAA ratio increased after treatment, specifically in treatment-responders. Phe/Tyr ratio decreased post-treatment in both responder and non-responder groups. Elevated EAA levels in FEP patients may signify compensatory responses to increased physiological demand for neurotransmitters or energy. Combining specific EAA supplementation with antipsychotic treatment may enhance treatment response in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".