MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404107960 · doi:10.1063/5.0233863

DFT based analysis of pressure driven mechanical, opto-electronic, and thermoelectric properties in lead-free InGeX3 (X = Cl, Br) perovskites for solar energy applications

2024· article· en· W4404107960 on OpenAlex
Md. Ratul Hasan, Imtiaz Ahamed Apon, Md. Mafidul Islam, Md. Aminuzzman, Mohammad Salman Haque

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoelectric effectMaterials scienceSolar energyThermoelectric materialsLead (geology)Energy (signal processing)Electronic structureEngineering physicsOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead halide perovskites have distinct physiochemical properties and demonstrate remarkable power conversion efficiency. We used density functional theory to investigate the electrical, optical, structural, and elastic features of non-toxic InGeCl3 and InGeBr3 halide perovskite compounds at different hydrostatic pressures, from 0 to 8 GPa. InGeCl3 and InGeBr3 halide perovskite exhibit noteworthy changes in their electronic and optical properties under different pressure conditions. When the pressure is 0 GPa, the direct bandgap for InGeCl3 is 0.886 eV, and for InGeBr3 it is 0.536 eV. This gap decreases as the pressure rises. Specifically, InGeBr3 exhibits conducting properties at 3 GPa due to its larger bromine atoms, whereas InGeCl3 requires a higher pressure of 6 GPa to achieve similar conductivity. This type of nature suggests that larger halogen atoms reduce the bandgap more effectively under pressure. As the pressure increases, the behavior of the lattice constant and unit cell volume decreases constantly, from 5.257 and 145.267 Å3 for InGeCl3 to 5.509 and 167.168 Å3 for InGeBr3 at 0 GPa for both compounds. When subjected to pressure, the bonds between In-X and Ge-X atoms experience compression, leading to a decrease in surface area and an enhancement in mechanical strength. Overall, the compounds exhibit characteristics of semiconductors, as evidenced by evaluations of their electrical properties. As pressure increases, the bandgap decreases linearly, narrowing until it aligns with the Fermi level, leading to a transition toward a metallic state. In addition, the pressure induces a rise in the electrical density of states around the Fermi level by displacing valence band electrons in an upward direction. As pressure increases, the electron density peak shifts to lower photon energy values. Notably, InGeCl3 exhibits a more pronounced shift in this peak compared to InGeBr3, indicating greater sensitivity to pressure. In terms of optical properties, both compounds demonstrate significant absorption coefficients in the visible region, suggesting their potential suitability for photovoltaic applications. The dielectric constant, absorption, and reflectivity values all increase gradually as pressure increases. The absorption spectra shift toward longer wavelengths. Furthermore, the mechanical properties analysis reveals that all InGeX3 compounds are mechanically stable up to 8 GPa pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it