Using heart rate data from wrist worn activity trackers to define thresholds for moderate to vigorous physical activity in children and young people with cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children and young people with cystic fibrosis (CYPwCF) are encouraged to do an average of 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) daily. However, there are no agreed heart rate (HR) thresholds for defining MVPA, so it is difficult to ascertain whether these targets are actually achieved. Wearable activity trackers enable continuous monitoring of fitness-related measures such as HR and could be used to measure duration and intensity of habitual MVPA. We aimed to define personalized and responsive MVPA thresholds from HR in CYPwCF, to determine habitual time spent in MVPA during childhood and adolescence. METHODS: Continuous daily HR data were collected from 142 CYPwCF wearing activity trackers over 16 months. Linear mixed-effects models were used to develop personalised estimates of resting heart rate (RHR), peak heart rate (PHR) and MVPA thresholds, which were defined using the American College of Sports Medicine heart rate reserve (HRR) method. RESULTS: 309,926 days of physical activity data showed that both RHR and PHR declined with age in CYPwCF, with considerable variability within and between individuals. The HRR method produced personalised MVPA thresholds for each CYPwCF based on age, which inherently accounted for individual demographic variability and personal factors such as cardiovascular fitness or disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: By accounting for within and between person variability in RHR and PHR, our novel method provides more accurate age-related personalised MVPA thresholds for CYPwCF than existing estimates. Our findings provide population-based estimates for RHR, PHR and MVPA thresholds at different ages in CYPwCF. This approach may help guide development of international standards for objective MVPA measurement in the era of remote HR and activity monitoring and facilitate accurate measurement of habitual physical activity in children and young people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".