MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404120998 · doi:10.24908/qap.v1i2.17353

Exploring the Use of Grifola Frondosa in the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration - A Proposed Methodology

2024· article· en· W4404120998 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Ostrovski, Sean Zinner

Bibliographic record

VenueQapsule Queen s Undergraduate Health Sciences Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrifola frondosaMacular degenerationMedicineComputer scienceOphthalmologyBiologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ergothioneine is a compound with demonstrated antioxidant properties that is found in high concentrations in the Grifola Frondosa mushroom. While the therapeutic effects of this substance have been investigated in various conditions related to oxidative stress, studies have not yet explored its role in preventing age-related macular degeneration. This is a progressive condition characterized by central vision loss due to reduction in the retinal pigment epithelium, for which oxidative damage is a significant risk factor. This study will explore whether administration of ergothioneine extract will reduce three major biomarkers of age-related oxidative stress. Ergothioniene will be administered to both wild-type and erythroid 2-related factor 2 knockout mice and compared to two corresponding control groups, for a total of four groups. Treatment will be administered at a dosage of 2 mg/kg body weight daily for 4 weeks. Quantitative autofluorescence, high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay techniques will be utilized to assess biomarkers. One-way analysis of variance will be used to determine statistical significance. This study intends to aid in the development of novel treatment compounds and encourage further explorations into the role of free radicals in various ophthalmological diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.300
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.061 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQapsule Queen s Undergraduate Health Sciences JournalSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207