MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404123159 · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003261

Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Pineocytomas: An International Multicenter Study

2024· article· en· W4404123159 on OpenAlexaff
Andréanne Hamel, Jean-Nicolas Tourigny, Ajay Niranjan, L. Dade Lunsford, Zhishuo Wei, Priyanka Srinivasan, Roman Liščák, Jaromír May, Nuria Martínez Moreno, Roberto Martínez Álvarez, Cheng‐Chia Lee, Huai‐Che Yang, Manjul Tripathi, Narendra Kumar, Elad Mashiach, Douglas Kondziolka, Robert G. Briggs, Cheng Yu, Gabriel Zada, Andrea Franzini, Guido Pecchioli, Gregory Bowden, Sam Dayawansa, Jason P. Sheehan, David Mathieu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiosurgeryTerm (time)Multicenter studyMEDLINEMedical physicsRadiologySurgeryRadiation therapyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pineocytomas are grade 1 tumors arising from the pineal parenchyma. Gross total resection can potentially cure these benign lesions but can be associated with morbidity. This study was designed to provide multi-institutional data to evaluate the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pineocytomas. METHODS: Centers participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation were asked to review their database and provide data for patients who had SRS for histology confirmed grade 1 pineocytomas, for whom clinical and imaging follow-up of at least 6 months was available. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients underwent SRS as part of the management of a pineocytoma. The median age at SRS was 39 years (range 8-76). SRS was performed as primary approach in 68%, adjuvant after partial resection 19%, and at recurrence in 13% of patients. The median margin dose was 15 Gy (range 11-25 Gy). The median treatment volume was 3.35 cc (range 0.1-17.9 cc). Local tumor control was achieved in 92% of patients, with a mean actuarial progression-free survival of 21.6 years (median not reached). At last follow-up, 82% were still controlled, 8% had local recurrence, and 10% had cerebrospinal fluid dissemination. Tumor control was significantly better when SRS was used as primary care compared with the adjuvant or recurrent setting ( P = .016). Five patients (13%) died during follow-up, all from tumor progression. The actuarial mean survival duration was 24.3 years, with a 5-year survival rate of 91%, and an estimated rate of 76% at 29 years. Larger tumor volume at SRS was found to be correlated to increased risk of death ( P = .045). Transient symptomatic adverse radiation effects were observed in 4 patients (11%). CONCLUSION: SRS appears safe and effective for the management of pineocytomas. Long-term tumor control is achieved in most cases. SRS can be offered to selected patients as an alternative to surgical resection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207