MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404123797 · doi:10.1364/boe.538560

Absolute depth-resolved optic axis measurement with catheter-based polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography

2024· article· en· W4404123797 on OpenAlexafffund
Shadi Masoumi, Jaeyul Lee, G. Jones, Mireille Quémener, Martin Parent, Brett E. Bouma, Lida P. Hariri, Daniel Côté, Martin Villiger

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringTerumoMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyOpticsDiffuse optical imagingOptical axisTomographyPolarization (electrochemistry)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imaging depth-resolved birefringence and optic axis orientation with polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) unveils details of tissue structure and organization that can be of high pathophysiologic, mechanistic, and diagnostic value. For catheter-based PS-OCT, the dynamic rotation of the fiber optic probe, in addition to the polarization effects of the system components, complicates the reliable and robust reconstruction of the sample's optic axis orientation. Addressing this issue, we present a new method for the reconstruction of absolute depth-resolved optic axis orientation in catheter-based PS-OCT by using the intrinsic retardance of the protecting catheter sheath as a stable guide star signal. Throughout the paper, we rigorously inspect the retardance and optic axis orientation of the sheath and validate our method by imaging a birefringent phantom with known optic axis orientation. Reconstructing the optic axis orientation of the phantom, placed at different locations around the catheter, we measured an average absolute deviation (AAD) for the mean optic axis orientation over cross-sectional images of 3.28°, even with significant bending stress on the catheter. This corresponds to an almost three-fold improvement compared to our earlier method (optic axis AAD of 9.41°). We finally highlight the capability of our reconstruction with stereotactic catheter-based PS-OCT of a fresh sheep brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Optics ExpressSame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207