Integrating histopathology and transcriptomics for spatial tumor microenvironment profiling in a melanoma case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local structures formed by cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play an important role in tumor development and treatment response. This study introduces SPoTLIghT, a computational framework providing a quantitative description of the tumor architecture from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides. We trained a weakly supervised machine learning model on melanoma patients linking tile-level imaging features extracted from H&E slides to sample-level cell type quantifications derived from RNA-sequencing data. Using this model, SPoTLIghT provides spatial cellular maps for any H&E image, and converts them in graphs to derive 96 interpretable features capturing TME cellular organization. We show how SPoTLIghT's spatial features can distinguish microenvironment subtypes and reveal nuanced immune infiltration structures not apparent in molecular data alone. Finally, we use SPoTLIghT to effectively predict patients' prognosis in an independent melanoma cohort. SPoTLIghT enhances computational histopathology providing a quantitative and interpretable characterization of the spatial contexture of tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".