Building permits—control of type IV pilus assembly by PilB and its cofactors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many bacteria produce type IV pili (T4P), surfaced-exposed protein filaments that enable cells to interact with their environment and transition from planktonic to surface-adapted states. T4P are dynamic, undergoing rapid cycles of filament extension and retraction facilitated by a complex protein nanomachine powered by cytoplasmic motor ATPases. Dedicated assembly motors drive the extension of the pilus fiber into the extracellular space, but like any machine, this process is tightly organized. These motors are coordinated by various ligands and binding partners, which control or optimize their functional associations with T4P machinery before cells commit to the crucial first step of building a pilus. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms that regulate T4P extension motor function. We discuss secondary messenger-dependent transcriptional or post-translational regulation acting both directly on the motor and through protein effectors. We also discuss the recent discoveries of naturally occurring extension inhibitors as well as alternative mechanisms of pilus assembly and motor-dependent signaling pathways. Given that T4P are important virulence factors for many bacterial pathogens, studying these motor regulatory systems will provide new insights into T4P-dependent physiology and efficient strategies to disable them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".