Infill Well Placement Optimization for Polymer Flooding in Offshore Oil Reservoirs via an Improved Archimedes Optimization Algorithm with a Halton Sequence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infill drilling is one of the most effective methods of improving the performance of polymer flooding. The difficulties related to infill drilling are determining the optimal numbers and placements of infill wells. In this study, an improved Archimedes optimization algorithm with a Halton sequence (HS-AOA) was proposed to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. First, to optimize infill well placement for polymer flooding, an objective function that considers the economic influence of infill drilling was developed. The novel optimization algorithm (HS-AOA) for infill well placement was subsequently developed by combining the AOA with the Halton sequence. The codes were developed in MATLAB 2023a and connected to a commercial reservoir simulator, Computer Modeling Group (CMG) STARS, Calgary, AB, Canada to carry out infill well placement optimization. Finally, the HS-AOA was compared to the basic AOA to confirm its reliability and then used to optimize the infill well placements for polymer flooding in a typical offshore oil reservoir. The results showed that the introduction of the Halton sequence into the AOA effectively increased the diversity of the initial objects in the AOA and prevented the HS-AOA from becoming trapped in the local optimal solutions. The HS-AOA outperformed the AOA. This approach was effective for optimizing the infill well placement for polymer flooding processes. In addition, infill drilling could effectively and economically improve the polymer flooding performance in offshore oil reservoirs. The net present value (NPV) of the polymer flooding case with infill wells determined by HS-AOA reached USD 3.5 × 108, which was an increase of 7% over that of the polymer flooding case. This study presents an effective method for optimizing infill well placement for polymer flooding processes. It can also serve as a valuable reference for other optimization problems in the petroleum industry, such as joint optimization of well control and placement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".