MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404147296 · doi:10.1186/s13014-024-02546-y

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) predicts relapse free and overall survival in unresected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

2024· article· en· W4404147296 on OpenAlexafffund
Fiorella Di Pastena, Gregory R. Pond, Evangelia E. Tsakiridis, André G. Gouveia, Elham Ahmadi, Olga‐Demetra Biziotis, Amr Ali, Anand Swaminath, Gordon Okawara, Bassam Abdulkarim, Naseer Ahmed, Andrew Robinson, Wilson Roa, Mario J. Valdés, Peter A. Kavsak, Marcin Wierzbicki, James Wright, Gregory R. Steinberg, Theodoros Tsakiridis

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical CentreMcGill UniversityJuravinski Cancer CentreCancerCare ManitobaOntario Clinical Oncology GroupGrand River HospitalQueen's UniversityMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHamilton Health Sciences Foundation
KeywordsMedicineGDF15ChemoradiotherapyOncologyInternal medicineLung cancerRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a cytokine of the TGFβ family. Here, we analyzed GDF15 levels in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) who participated in OCOG-ALMERA (NCT02115464), a phase II randomized clinical trial, that investigated metformin in combination with standard of care concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). OCOG-ALMERA was not able to demonstrate benefit in the metformin arm. Therefore, biomarker studies are needed to better define stratification parameters for future trials. Patients were randomized to treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent chest radiotherapy (60–66 Gy), with or without metformin (2000 mg/d). The trial collected tumor volume parameters, survival outcomes, and patient blood plasma at baseline, during (weeks 1 and 6) and 6 months after cCRT. Plasma GDF15 levels were assayed with the ELISA method. Statistical analyses explored associations between GDF15, survival outcomes, and radiotherapy tumor volumes. Baseline plasma levels of GDF15 were elevated in study patients, they increased during cCRT (p < 0.001), and the addition of metformin was associated with a further increase (week 6, p = 0.033). Baseline GDF15 levels correlated with the radiotherapy gross target volume (GTV, p < 0.01), while week 1 of radiotherapy levels correlated with radiotherapy planned target volume (PTV, p < 0.006). In multivariate analysis, baseline plasma GDF15 was prognostic for poor relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). GDF15 is a plasma marker that responds to the treatment of unresected LA-NSCLC with cCRT and metformin. GDF15 levels correspond with tumor volume and increased GDF15 levels predict for poor RFS and OS. These results require validation in larger clinical trial datasets. Analysis of plasma specimens of OCOG-ALMERA, a phase II clinical trial that investigated metformin in combination with standard of care concurrent chemoradiotherapy, suggests that the cytokine growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) may be a promising biomarker in unresected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). GDF15 levels increased during chemoradiotherapy, did more so in metformin-treated patients and corresponded with the radiotherapy clinical target volumes. Baseline plasma levels of GDF15 predicted overall and relapse-free survival. Validation of these results within larger clinical trials could lead to the establishment of an easily assessable plasma biomarker that could guide LA-NSCLC treatment in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation OncologySame topicGDF15 and Related BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207