Comparative Genomic and Secretome Analysis of Phytophthora capsici Strains: Exploring Pathogenicity and Evolutionary Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytophthora capsici is a destructive oomycete pathogen that poses a significant threat to global agriculture by infecting a wide range of economically important crops in the Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae families. In Canada, the pathogen has been responsible for substantial losses in greenhouse and field-grown crops. Despite extensive worldwide research on P. capsici, little is known about the effector content and pathogenicity of the Canadian isolates. In this study, we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of two Canadian P. capsici strains, namely 55330 and 55898, and conducted a comparative secretome analysis with globally referenced strains LT1534 and LT263. The Canadian strains displayed smaller genomes at 57.3 Mb and 60.2 Mb compared to LT263 at 76 Mb, yet retained diverse effector repertoires, including RxLR and CRN effectors, and exhibited robust pathogenic potential. Our analysis revealed that while the Canadian strains have fewer unique effector clusters compared to LT263, they possess comparable CAZyme profiles, emphasizing their capacity to degrade plant cell walls and promote infection. The differences in effector content likely reflect host adaptation, as P. capsici infects a variety of plant species. This study provides valuable insights into the genetic features of Canadian P. capsici isolates and offers a foundation for future efforts in developing targeted disease-management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".