MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404148103 · doi:10.1016/j.bpr.2024.100186

TC10 differently controls the dynamics of Exo70 in growth cones of cortical and hippocampal neurons

2024· article· en· W4404148103 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hiteshika Gosain, Karin B. Busch

Bibliographic record

VenueBiophysical Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGutenberg ForschungskollegDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and PetroleumGlaucoma Research Foundation
KeywordsHippocampal formationDynamics (music)NeuroscienceCortical neuronsBiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exocyst is an octameric protein complex that acts as a tether for GOLGI-derived vesicles at the plasma membrane during exocytosis. It is involved in membrane expansion during axonal outgrowth. Exo70 is a major subunit of the exocyst complex and is controlled by TC10, a Rho family GTPase. How TC10 affects the dynamics of Exo70 at the plasma membrane is not well understood. There is also evidence that TC10 controls Exo70 dynamics differently in nonpolar cells and axons. To address this, we used super-resolution microscopy to study the spatially resolved effects of TC10 on Exo70 dynamics in HeLa cells and the growth cone of cortical and hippocampal neurons. We generated single-particle localization and trajectory maps and extracted mean square displacements, diffusion coefficients, and alpha coefficients to characterize Exo70 diffusion. We found that the diffusivity of Exo70 was different in nonpolar cells and the growth cone of neurons. TC10 stimulated the mobility of Exo70 in HeLa cells but decreased the diffusion of Exo70 in the growth cone of cortical neurons. In contrast to cortical neurons, TC10 overexpression did not affect the mobility of Exo70 in the axonal growth cone of hippocampal neurons. These data suggest that mainly exocyst tethering in cortical neurons was under the control of TC10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiophysical ReportsSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207