MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404149341 · doi:10.4039/tce.2024.18

An update on the identity of <i>Longitarsus</i> (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) species introduced or relocated in Canada for the biological control of tansy ragwort (Asteraceae)

2024· article· en· W4404149341 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Ivo Toševski, Kevin D. Floate

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersRussian Academy of Sciences
KeywordsAsteraceaeBiological pest controlBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Starting in the 1960s, the flea beetle Longitarsus jacobaeae (Waterhouse) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) has been imported and relocated to North America for the control of the weed tansy ragwort, Jacobaea vulgaris (Asteraceae). Some Longitarsus species are morphologically almost indistinguishable, leading to questions regarding the taxonomic identity of the beetles released. Here, we present the results of a molecular study that addresses these questions and updates a list of the releases of Longitarsus within Canada. Our findings confirm the suspected release of the cryptic species L. flavicornis concurrent with releases of L . jacobaeae at sites in British Columbia, Canada, in the 1970s. However, we find no evidence for the continued presence of L. flavicornis at historical release sites in British Columbia nor in Nova Scotia, Canada, where it might potentially have been redistributed. We confirm the presence of L. gracilis Kutschera in Nova Scotia and British Columbia, the latter population likely established from a 2005 release of Longitarsus from Nova Scotia. To our knowledge, this study provides the first published confirmation of L. gracilis in Canada. Finally, we provide evidence that what were recognised in earlier work as three separate taxa ( L. succineus (Foudras), L. near noricus , and Longitarsus sp.) are likely all L. succineus .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207