Brain functional alternation in patients with systemic sclerosis: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric manifestations, such as cognitive impairment, are relatively prevalent in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. This study aimed to investigate the resting state (RS) functional alternations of SSc patients and the potential influenced factors. METHODS: Forty-four SSc patients (mean age, 46.3 ± 11.4 years; 40 females) and 19 age and sex comparable healthy volunteers (mean age, 42.6 ± 11.3 years; 16 females) were recruited and underwent RS functional MR imaging (fMRI) and neuropsychological assessments. Functional segregation analysis was performed to calculate the amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo). Functional integration analysis was conducted using group independent component analysis to calculate intra-network and inter-network functional connectivity (FC). The fMRI measurements were compared between SSc patients and healthy volunteers using voxel-based pairwise two-sample t-tests. The correlations between clinical characteristics and fMRI measurements were also analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to healthy volunteers, SSc patients exhibited significantly decreased ALFF and increased ReHo (all P < 0.01, FWE corrected). SSc patients predominantly showed decreased intra-network and inter-network FC in the auditory network, visual network, default mode network, frontoparietal network and attention network (intra-network FC: P < 0.01, uncorrected, cluster size > 30; inter-network FC: P < 0.05, FDR correction). Furthermore, clinical characteristics including disease duration (r value ranged from - 0.31 to 0.36), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = 0.35), Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (r = 0.43), and Hamilton Depression Scale score (r = -0.40) were significantly associated with fMRI measurements (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous activity and functional connectivity alternations can be seen in SSc patients, which are partially associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations and tend to aggravate with disease duration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".