Physical education teachers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: conceptualizing outdoors as a job demand and resource for school wellbeing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Education systems across the world were significantly impacted by the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic. To accommodate physical distancing requirements mandated by public health authorities, many school gymnasiums were co-opted to become classrooms, consequently displacing many physical and health educators to teach in outdoor contexts. Through semi-structured interview methods, this research unpacked the perspectives of 10 Canadian physical and health educators’ experiences teaching outdoors during the pandemic. Findings indicated that: (a) physical educators struggled to navigate COVID-19 school protocols; (b) outdoor learning environments mitigated the strain of these regulations; (c) outdoor contexts benefited the wellbeing of staff and students; and (d) there were challenges associated with teaching outdoors. Utilizing the job demands-resource theoretical framework, this study illuminated a novel concepetualization of how teaching in outdoor spaces served as both a challenging job demand, but also a valuable job resource to support school wellbeing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it