Effects of home-based exercise alone or combined with cognitive training on cognition in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structured and supervised physical exercise and cognitive training are two efficient ways to enhance cognition in older adults. Performing both within a combined intervention could maximize their effect on cognition due to their potential synergy on brain functions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, these interventions were particularly relevant due to the collateral impact of social restrictions regarding physical activity and the level of cognitive stimulation. However, the benefits of remotely monitored intervention combining physical exercise and cognitive training for older adult cognition remain to be demonstrated. 127 older adults (age: 65.20 ± 7.95) were randomized in two arms, encouraging self-engagement in six months of home-based physical exercise alone or combined with cognitive training, monitored by phone once a week. Neuropsychological assessment was performed under videoconference supervision at baseline and after three and six months. Composite Z -scores were calculated for processing speed, executive functioning, working, and episodic memory to assess changes after three and six months of training. The weekly metabolic expenditure of self-reported activities was estimated using the compendium of physical activity to distinguish participants performing higher and lower doses of exercise (median split). 106 participants (83.46 %) completed the 6-month training. Results showed a greater Z -score change in executive functioning for participants in the combined arm than those who only exercised (F = 4.127, p = 0.046, η p 2 = 0.050). Group x Exercise dose interaction was observed for episodic memory Z-score change (F = 6.736, p = 0.011, η p 2 = 0.070), with a greater improvement for participants performing higher doses of exercise compared to those who performed a lower dose, only in exercise alone arm. Performing a higher dose of exercise increased the working memory Z -score change in both intervention arms compared to a lower dose (F = 7.391, p = 0.008, η p 2 = 0.076). Remote combined training may lead to larger improvement in executive functioning than exercise alone. Physical exercise showed a dose-related improvement in working and episodic memory performances. The combination of cognitive interventions mitigated the effects of exercise on episodic memory. These results suggest that home-based exercise and cognitive training may help improve older adults' cognition. COVEPIC was retrospectively registered on December 03, 2020. Clinical trials Identifier: NCT04635462 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04635462?term=NCT04635462&draw=2&rank=1 • Combining cognitive training with exercise may improve executive functioning and episodic memory in older adults • A higher dose of exercise is associated with increased benefits in working and episodic memory for older adults • Home-based intervention, including exercise and cognitive training remotely monitored once a week, is likely to support older adults cognition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".