MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404164312 · doi:10.1186/s13073-024-01403-7

Exploring multi-omics and clinical characteristics linked to accelerated biological aging in Asian women of reproductive age: insights from the S-PRESTO study

2024· article· en· W4404164312 on OpenAlexaff
Li Chen, Karen Tan, Jia Xu, Priti Mishra, Sartaj Ahmad Mir, Min Gong, Kothandaraman Narasimhan, Bryan Ng, Jun Shi Lai, Mya Thway Tint, Shirong Cai, Suresh Anand Sadananthan, Navin Michael, Jadegoud Yaligar, S. Sendhil Velan, Melvin Khee‐Shing Leow, Kok Hian Tan, Jerry Chan, Michael J. Meaney, Shiao‐Yng Chan, Yap Seng Chong, Johan G. Eriksson

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyNational Research Foundation SingaporeNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational University Health SystemNational Research Foundation
KeywordsOmicsHuman geneticsReproductive medicineReproductive biologyHealthy agingGerontologyMedicineBioinformaticsProteomicsSystems biologyComputational biologyBiologyPhysiologyGeneticsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Phenotypic age (PhenoAge), a widely used marker of biological aging, has been shown to be a robust predictor of all-cause mortality and morbidity in different populations. Existing studies on biological aging have primarily focused on individual domains, resulting in a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the multi-systemic dysregulation that occurs in aging. METHODS: PhenoAge was evaluated based on a linear combination of chronological age (CA) and 9 clinical biomarkers in 952 multi-ethnic Asian women of reproductive age. Phenotypic age acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel), an aging biomarker, represents PhenoAge after adjusting for CA. This study conducts an in-depth association analysis of PhenoAgeAccel with clinical, nutritional, lipidomic, gut microbiome, and genetic factors. RESULTS: Higher adiposity, glycaemia, plasma saturated fatty acids, kynurenine pathway metabolites, GlycA, riboflavin, nicotinamide, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins were positively associated with PhenoAgeAccel. Conversely, a healthier diet and higher levels of pyridoxal phosphate, all-trans retinol, betaine, tryptophan, glutamine, histidine, apolipoprotein B, and insulin-like growth factors were inversely associated with PhenoAgeAccel. Lipidomic analysis found 132 lipid species linked to PhenoAgeAccel, with PC(O-36:0) showing the strongest positive association and CE(24:5) demonstrating the strongest inverse association. A genome-wide association study identified rs9864994 as the top genetic variant (P = 5.69E-07) from the ZDHHC19 gene. Gut microbiome analysis revealed that Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 and Bacteroides vulgatus were inversely associated with PhenoAgeAccel. Integrative network analysis of aging-related factors underscored the intricate links among clinical, nutritional and lipidomic variables, such as positive associations between kynurenine pathway metabolites, amino acids, adiposity, and insulin resistance. Furthermore, potential mediation effects of blood biomarkers related to inflammation, immune response, and nutritional and energy metabolism were observed in the associations of diet, adiposity, genetic variants, and gut microbial species with PhenoAgeAccel. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a comprehensive analysis of aging-related factors across multiple platforms, delineating their complex interconnections. This study is the first to report novel signatures in lipidomics, gut microbiome and blood biomarkers specifically associated with PhenoAgeAccel. These insights are invaluable in understanding the molecular and metabolic mechanisms underlying biological aging and shed light on potential interventions to mitigate accelerated biological aging by targeting modifiable factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome MedicineSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207