MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404167691 · doi:10.1088/2516-1083/ad9074

Global floating PV status and potential

2024· article· en· W4404167691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Floating photovoltaics (FPV) has been a rapidly growing source of renewable electricity for the past 15 years since first commercial systems were installed. In this work, the insights from SERIS FPV database are shared. This is likely the largest database of its kind and contains the information from 1142 FPV systems in operation, totalling 5.9 GWp, by the end of 2022. Mainland China has been leading FPV installation capacities since 2017 and comprises almost half of the cumulative installed capacity. Similar to land-based PV, FPV installation size has been increasing; the median size has grown from 0.09 MWp in 2013 to 1.40 MWp in 2022, while the median power density has increased from 82 Wp m −2 to 123 Wp m −2 in the same timeframe. The installation cost has fallen simultaneously – the lowest reported was 0.41 USD/Wp in India in 2021. Other pertinent insights from SERIS FPV database include float supplier market share, reported electricity price, water body types and characteristics, as well as its coverage ratio. Finally, the global FPV potential (capacity, energy production, and water saving), for different tilt angles, tracking configurations, and solar panel types are explored. By installing FPV on 10% of the area of 249 717 inland reservoirs, FPV capacity could reach up to 22 TWp and could fulfil the whole global electricity consumption and up to 5% of the world’s water demand. The use of trackers and bifacial panels are advantageous for energy generation in all locations, with trackers increasing specific energy yield of a typical fixed 10° tilt FPV by up to 50% for reservoirs within <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> latitude, while the bifacial gains reach up to 4.5% for all analysed configurations within <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> latitude. The insights from this global FPV market and potential analysis can serve as a reliable reference for FPV stakeholders, researchers, and regulators alike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it