Kincentric Spirituality in Management Education: Rematriating Trauma-informed Intersectional Love
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an andragogical praxis of traumainformed intersectional love as a way of returning to sacred relationships in management spirituality education. The theories that enrich our praxis are kincentric ecology, spiritual holism and rematriation. We suggest that these support us in unlearning colonialism, cisheteropatriarchy and anthropocentrism. We encourage building a community of learning in the classroom that fosters knowledge gardening/collective storytelling, relational accountability, compassionate self-inquiry and critical collective curiosity. We offer practical examples to inspire your journey into weaving trauma-informed intersectional love in your classroom practice. We storytell the ways they rematriate love, curiosity and play while engaging landbased and art-based learning to promote anti-racism, cultural safety, and gender-based respect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".