Artemis and its role in cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Artemis protein appears to play an important role in cancer. • It is involved in the non-homologous end joining repair and V(D)J recombination. • Loss of its function causes cellular radiosensitivity. • Its deregulation correlates with poor outcomes and treatment resistance in cancer. • It can be targetable for cancer therapies by non-oncology and novel drugs. Artemis is a key nuclease involved in the non-homologous end joining repair pathway upon DNA double-stranded breaks and during V(D)J recombination. It participates in various cellular processes and cooperates with various proteins involved in tumorigenesis. Its hereditary mutations lead to several pathological conditions, such as severe combined immunodeficiency with radiation sensitivity. Recent studies suggest that Artemis deregulation plays an important role in cancer and is associated with poorer oncologic outcomes and resistance to treatment including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapeutics. Artemis emerges as an attractive candidate for cancer prognosis and treatment. Its role in modulating sensitivity to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents makes it an appealing target for drug development. Various existing drugs and novel compounds have been described to inhibit Artemis activity. This review synthesizes the up-to-date information regarding Artemis function, its role in different malignancies and its clinical utility as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in Oncology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it