MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404171063 · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2024.10.019

Joint jammer selection and power optimization in covert communications against a warden with uncertain locations

2024· article· en· W4404171063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Communications and Networks · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development ProgramCanadian Anesthesiologists' Society
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Selection (genetic algorithm)Power (physics)CovertTelecommunicationsComputer networkOperations researchArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In covert communications, joint jammer selection and power optimization are important to improve performance. However, existing schemes usually assume a warden with a known location and perfect Channel State Information (CSI), which is difficult to achieve in practice. To be more practical, it is important to investigate covert communications against a warden with uncertain locations and imperfect CSI, which makes it difficult for legitimate transceivers to estimate the detection probability of the warden. First, the uncertainty caused by the unknown warden location must be removed, and the Optimal Detection Position (OPTDP) of the warden is derived which can provide the best detection performance (i.e., the worst case for a covert communication). Then, to further avoid the impractical assumption of perfect CSI, the covert throughput is maximized using only the channel distribution information. Given this OPTDP based worst case for covert communications, the jammer selection, the jamming power, the transmission power, and the transmission rate are jointly optimized to maximize the covert throughput (OPTDP-JP). To solve this coupling problem, a Heuristic algorithm based on Maximum Distance Ratio (H-MAXDR) is proposed to provide a sub-optimal solution. First, according to the analysis of the covert throughput, the node with the maximum distance ratio (i.e., the ratio of the distances from the jammer to the receiver and that to the warden) is selected as the friendly jammer (MAXDR). Then, the optimal transmission and jamming power can be derived, followed by the optimal transmission rate obtained via the bisection method. In numerical and simulation results, it is shown that although the location of the warden is unknown, by assuming the OPTDP of the warden, the proposed OPTDP-JP can always satisfy the covertness constraint. In addition, with an uncertain warden and imperfect CSI, the covert throughput provided by OPTDP-JP is 80% higher than the existing schemes when the covertness constraint is 0.9, showing the effectiveness of OPTDP-JP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it