SysQuan: repurposing SILAC mice for the affordable absolute quantitation of the human proteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Relative quantitation, used by most MS-based proteomics laboratories to determine protein fold-changes , requires samples being processed and analyzed together for best comparability through minimizing batch differences. This limits the adoption of MS-based proteomics in population-wide studies, and the detection of subtle but relevant changes in heterogeneous samples. Absolute quantitation circumvents these limitations and enables comparison of results across laboratories, studies, and longitudinally. However, high costs of the essential stable isotope labeled (SIL) standards prevents widespread access and limits the number of quantifiable proteins. Our new approach, called “SysQuan”, repurposes SILAC mouse tissues/biofluids as system-wide internal standards for matched human samples to enable absolute quantitation of, theoretically, two-thirds of the human proteome using 157,086 shared tryptic peptides. We demonstrate that SysQuan enables quantification of 70% and 31% of the liver and plasma proteomes, respectively. We demonstrate for 14 metabolic proteins that abundant SIL mouse tissues enable cost-effective reverse absolute quantitation in, theoretically, 1000s of human samples. Moreover, 10,000s of light/heavy doublets in untargeted SysQuan datasets enable unique post-acquisition absolute quantitation. SysQuan empowers researchers to replace relative quantitation with affordable absolute quantitation at scale, making data comparable across laboratories, diseases and tissues, enabling completely novel study designs and increasing reusability of data in repositories. TOC Graphic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".