Using photovoice to investigate patient experiences of lupus nephritis in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting up to 60% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The perspectives of patients with SLE have been explored; however, little is known of the lived experiences of patients with LN. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with biopsy-proven pure or mixed International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society Class III, IV or V LN were purposefully recruited from a Canadian lupus cohort to participate in a photovoice (visual-narrative participatory research method) exercise. Participants took photos of what LN means to them, impacts on daily life and factors impacting LN management. Photos were shared and discussed in focus groups. RESULTS: 13 individuals with LN participated (92.3% were female; mean (SD) age was 41.7 (14.0) years). The mean (SD) number of photos shared per participant was 4.2 (0.9). Photos (n=54) depicted activities/settings that contribute to well-being (n=15), the participants themselves (n=13), healthcare experiences (n=10), home (n=4), community (n=2), friends (n=2), work (n=2) and other challenges (n=6). All participants described physical and psychosocial impacts of living with LN. Although 12 mentioned activities/settings that contribute to well-being (eg, time in natural environments), participants were consistently reminded of limitations imposed by LN due to physical symptoms, challenges presented by the physical environment and the altered life trajectories experienced. Participants discussed the dual burden of LN and the associated medication journey; side effects and medication-related financial challenges were highlighted by ten and five participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported a substantial psychosocial burden associated with altered life trajectories, the dual burden of LN and the associated medication journey, and the conflicting role of the physical environment. The need for flexibility (ie, from employers, themselves) is an essential component of navigating altered life trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".